DSL Operation with DirecTV Sat Receiver
DirecTV (DTV) has provided video and audio quality as well as reliable service for the many years. Compared to other HDTV providers, their video
quality is the best IMO. Over the years, all satellite rcvrs improve as they do, I upgrade to the newer versions. Recently, an H24 replaced
my H23-600 model.
Many today use an Ethernet connection directly into a DVR type rcvr and don't require a phone line connection. Unfortunately, I don't like to
record events . . . if I can't watch it live, then I'll miss the program.
All DTV rcvrs can be tied into the phone line so that PPV (movies, special events) can be automatically ordered via the remote control. The
phone line serves to provide DTV with the rcvr's location as well record the purchase on the "smart-card". Later, during the month, the rcvr
"phones home" upon command to dump the PPV purchases and reset the card.
ADSL and POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) share the same two copper wires coming into the home. As the sketch shows, the inside telephone
wiring carries both POTS and ADSL service. Splitters and filters separate the signals so that there's no interference to the DSL signal, at
least in principle.
In my home, the phone line carries both signals. The DSL service consists of 1.5Mbps ADSL which is top speed for my distant location from the
Central Office (CO). The measured D/L speed is 1.35Mbps and U/L speed is 0.35Mbps. Not the speediest of DSL service but it
works nicely for my needs. Note the "white-box" labeled Z-Blkr Filter. More about it later.
POTS and ADSL service occupy different frequency spectrums. POTS exists in the 0-4 kHz region and ADSL service is present from 26kHz
to approximately 1.1MHz.
The "upstream" spectrum lies between 26Khz and 130Khz. The "downstream" spectrum lies between 134Khz and 1.1Mhz. There's a guard band between
4Khz and 26Khz to minimize interference with POTs and upstream data.
The frequency layout can be summarized as:
0-4 Khz, voice,
4-25 Khz, unused guard band,
25-138 Khz, upstream,
130-1104 Khz, downstream.
DSL Interference
The newly upgraded H24 rcvr replaced the older H23-600 rcvr. With the phone line connected to the H24, my DSL performance
suffered; low speed, lost packets, line stalls so I investigated to find what differences there might be.
The H23 rcvr's modem output showed as 9.5Mohm where the H24 shows 2.5Mohm, a 7Mohm difference! With the H23, there
were no DSL operating problems. Unplugging the phone line to the H24 also cleared up the DSL problems. So it appears that the impedance
difference is the "problem".
So I made an "impedance expander" (simply add more resistance!) to test. Using an old Radio Shack Ring-Kill product, I modified it by
soldering two (2) high value resistors, 3.5Mohm to the PCB. They were in series with the "green" and "red" lines, making the total
measured impedance (plugged into the H24) as 10Mohm. My DSL performance returned to normal.
Please note that even though the problem SEEMED to solved, the 2.5Mohm impedance should be large enough to not adversely effect
DSL performance, so there must be some other frequency anomalies output from the H24 rcvr that disrupts the DSL signal.
The 3.5M resistors in series with each line, severly attenuate the H24's modem output "tone" level so that the "phone-home" data is lost
in the noise! The POTs line is apx 200 ohms impedance so the math shows a large signal drop. Obviously unacceptable!
POTS Filter Design
Since I have a few "Excelsus Z-Blocker DSL Filter" on hand, this would make a perfect item. The filter is designed to attenuate and
separate an ADSL signal into the "POTS" voice band, 0 - 4Khz while passing the ADSL signal with no attenuation.
I tried it out and put it inline with the telco line going to the H24 rcvr. The white-box shown in the interconnection diagram is a stock
filter labeled "Z-Blkr Filter". I then started an Spice analysis to see what might be improved.
|
Z-Block Filter Stock Analysis
Using 5Spice, the Z-Blocker filter was analyzed to see how it shapes the POTS frequency spectrum;
a LPF with 4Khz as the corner frequency. What the analysis showed is precisely why that filter didn't work.
The "stock" filter analysis shows it doesn't just cover the POTS filter band but extends to 25Khz before attenuating signals.
At 18Khz, there's a peak of 0dB. Not what you expect. Note that at 100Khz, the filter stop band attenuation is only -40db. Compared to the
"ideal" filter response (in BLUE), the spurious response between 5Khz and 30Khz shows that the circuit values are no where close to optimum!
Each filter element, L1 - L4 and C1 - C3 were de-soldered from the PCB and measured as shown in the schematic.
The value of each element including inductor's series resistance:
L1 = 4.95mH - Rs = 4.45 ohms
L2 = 4.92mH - Rs = 4.40 ohms
L3 = 4.47mH - Rs = 3.80 ohms
L4 = 4.46mH - Rs = 4.78 ohms
* The series resistance wasn't included in the ckt modeling b/c the values didn't effect the filter's response.
Now, having all circuit elements quantified, the 5Spice schematic was re-drawn into the program's schematic capture and then run to analyze it for improved circuit
response.
|
Z-Block Filter Modified Analysis
After a preliminary analysis, it was apparent that the original C1, C2 and C3 values, 0.01uf were not optimum. A little more showed that
0.2uf ceramic caps were the correct values. Parts (0.02uf, 100V) were purchased from Mouser Electronics
here
It also become obvious, that swapping the inductors would materially improve the filter and the filter should PLUG INTO THE RCVR and
not into the phone line!
The inductors, L1 - L4 were swapped position wise as shown in the picture below.
The H24 modem is "on-hook" until it "phones-home" when the modem's output impedance is apx 200 ohms. The analysis is shows the response when
the rcvr is active. The resultant performance curve DOES reflect a POTS response of 0 to 4Khz and approximates the ideal response
chart (in BLUE). Also note -34dB attenuation @ 25Khz, the start of the "upstream" band.
|